Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!
2008-02-01 10:41:48
Bound, Jim wrote:
<snip>
NB; Ray this is not personal or against IAOC at all. We know you do the best
you can with the budget you have. But being in the city anytime gives us all
more options after IETF work. I for one do not come at all to the IETF for any
social things not even a consideration, this is business and business travel.
Thanks for the hard work.
Our first choice is under one-roof, guest rooms and meeting space
(Minneapolis), in the city center, but it's not always possible. We
want the meeting to be well supported and provide alternatives for the
attendees. We will stay focused on that target.
Ray
/jim
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of Jari Arkko
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:29 AM
To: Dean Willis
Cc: IETF Discussion
Subject: Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!
Dean,
We should know by now that isolated resorts ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE as
meeting locations.
Er... like Dallas or San Diego?
I've never been to Dublin and I don't know what exists on
site. Maybe some locals could tell us? Also, as has happened
in a number of IETFs so far (like in Dallas), Ray is
scheduling a bus service for us. More generally, before we
criticize meeting site selections, lets at least first figure
out what the true conditions really are.
I look forward to going to Dublin.
Jari
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!, (continued)
Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!, Stephen Farrell
Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!, Scott Brim
Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!, Jari Arkko
Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!, Stephen Farrell
Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!, James M. Polk
Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!, Ray Pelletier
RE: IETF 72 --> Dublin!, GOLDMAN, STUART O \(STUART\)
Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!, Marshall Eubanks
Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!, Dave Crocker
|
|
|