Bob Hinden wrote:
It is attached. It includes the raw data and a new graph that shows
attendance by percentage. It appears to me that a 1-1-1 meeting
policy is justified by current overall IETF meeting attendance.
I agree with your proposal.
Nevertheless, I have to say that deciding the location of meetings based
on the current attendance is a chicken-and-egg issue: attendance by
participants of a specific country is not going to be high when the
location is far from that country. This is particularly true for
developing countries, where it has always been a problem to get funding
for attending meetings.
Just my two cents....
Thanks!
Kind regards,
--
Fernando Gont
e-mail: fernando(_at_)gont(_dot_)com(_dot_)ar || fgont(_at_)acm(_dot_)org
PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf