In
<CE541259607DE94CA2A23816FB49F4A311003C(_at_)vhqpostal6(_dot_)verisign(_dot_)com>
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> writes:
BL "Listing all
of UUNET?"
- flat out false. No even remotely respectable blacklist has
ever done so.
SPEWS listed VeriSign labs because it was on a UUNET address.
Case closed, no appeal.
SPEWS makes a point of never justifying itself to anyone, if they want
to correct any statement they believe false they can speak for themselves.
Uh, the claim that spews listed one domain means that spews listed ALL
UUNET domains? And this is a "case closed, no appeal" evidence of
such an action by spews?
I realize that verisign is very close to your heart but, personally, I
don't consider them to be the whole world.
Could you give us some help in tracking down this particular spews
listing? What did it say? What IP addresses were involved? (The IP
addresses can be used to see if other BLs also reported spam from
them.)
-wayne
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg