On 11/16/2005 13:11, wayne wrote:
In <200511161237(_dot_)36167(_dot_)scott(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> Scott
Kitterman
<spf2(_at_)kitterman(_dot_)com> writes:
It seems to me that there is at least a rough consensus that the
council stay in existence at least until we have an SPF RFC.
This seems to be the case.
Actually, upon further review, I think we need to keep the council around of
Wayne needs to add another AUTH48 change to hist list. The council is
mentioned in the internet draft:
http://www.schlitt.net/spf/spf_classic/draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.html#anchor39
That's the Received-SPF mail header IANA considerations paragraph. It says
(among other things):
" Related information:
Requesting SPF Council review of any proposed changes and additions to this
field is recommended. For information about SPF Council see
http://spf.mehnle.net/";
Scott K
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com