IETF OpenPGP (date)
April 26, 2002
- Re: Musings on Notary signatures, vedaal, 13:47
- Re: Musings on Notary signatures, Jon Callas, 12:48
- Re: Musings on Notary signatures, David Shaw, 12:20
- Re: Musings on Notary signatures, john . dlugosz, 12:17
- Re: Notary signatures, Hal Finney, 09:46
- Re: Musings on Notary signatures, David Shaw, 09:21
- Re: Musings on Notary signatures, vedaal, 09:05
- Musings on Notary signatures, john . dlugosz, 08:13
- Re: Notary signatures, Derek Atkins, 06:33
- Re: Notary signatures, David Shaw, 04:19
- Re: Notary signatures, Werner Koch, 01:41
April 25, 2002
- Re: Notary signatures, Len Sassaman, 23:53
- Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas, 22:33
- Re: Notary signatures, David Shaw, 21:17
- Re: Notary signatures, Derek Atkins, 20:21
- Re: Notary signatures, David Shaw, 19:08
- Re: Timestamp Signatures (was Re: Notary signatures), Jon Callas, 18:55
- Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas, 18:48
- Re: Notary signatures, Hal Finney, 18:27
- Re: Timestamp Signatures (was Re: Notary signatures), David Shaw, 18:19
- Re: Notary signatures, David Shaw, 18:09
- Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas, 18:02
- Timestamp Signatures (was Re: Notary signatures), Jon Callas, 17:58
- Re: Notary signatures, Len Sassaman, 17:54
- Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas, 17:33
- Re: Notary signatures, David Shaw, 17:05
- Re: Notary signatures, Jon Callas, 16:49
- Re: Notary signatures, Len Sassaman, 16:22
- Notary signatures, David Shaw, 15:07
- New Draft Gone Out, Jon Callas, 14:30
- RE: non-transferable sigs with hashes and encryption only (Re: Recipient-verifiable messages), Dominikus Scherkl, 12:31
April 18, 2002
- Re: bis04, Paul Holman, 21:28
- Re: non-transferable sigs with hashes and encryption only (Re: Recipient-verifiable messages), Hal Finney, 20:12
- non-transferable sigs with hashes and encryption only (Re: Recipient-verifiable messages), Adam Back, 19:19
- Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., john . dlugosz, 13:23
- Re: What's left before a new RFC?, john . dlugosz, 12:50
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Werner Koch, 12:48
- Re: What's left before a new RFC?, john . dlugosz, 12:41
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Hal Finney, 12:29
- Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., Marc Mutz, 12:25
- Re: What's left before a new RFC?, Marc Mutz, 12:25
- Re: Whither comment packets?, Adam Back, 11:57
- Re: Whither comment packets?, Werner Koch, 10:51
- Re: Whither comment packets?, Jon Callas, 10:17
- Whither comment packets?, David Shaw, 09:45
- Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., john . dlugosz, 09:31
- Re: What's left before a new RFC?, Marcel Waldvogel, 07:46
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Adam Back, 06:44
- Re: What's left before a new RFC?, Marc Mutz, 03:52
- Re: What's left before a new RFC?, Marcel Waldvogel, 01:17
April 17, 2002
- Re: bis04: revocation key nits, David Shaw, 19:40
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Hal Finney, 19:35
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Hal Finney, 19:07
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Adam Back, 18:26
- Re: bis04: revocation key nits, Jon Callas, 18:18
- Re: Revocation target subpacket (Re: What's left before a new RFC?), David Shaw, 17:52
- bis04: revocation key nits, David Shaw, 17:49
- Revocation target subpacket (Re: What's left before a new RFC?), Michael Young, 17:22
- Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., Thomas Roessler, 16:50
- What's left before a new RFC?, Jon Callas, 15:58
- Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., Jon Callas, 15:48
- Re: literal data packet tags - nit, Jon Callas, 14:38
- Re: sha-1 protected test key, Timo Schulz, 13:47
- Re: sha-1 protected test key, Imad R. Faiad, 13:02
- sha-1 protected test key, Werner Koch, 08:55
- Re: bis04: Armor headers w/ non-us-ascii values, Thomas Roessler, 06:16
- bis04: Armor headers w/ non-us-ascii values, Marc Mutz, 06:01
- Re: Clearsigning, MIME, etc., Thomas Roessler, 02:35
- literal data packet tags - nit, Thomas Roessler, 02:34
April 16, 2002
- Clearsigning, MIME, etc., Jon Callas, 18:06
- Re: bis04, David Shaw, 10:15
- Re: bis04, john . dlugosz, 09:01
- Re: bis04, Thomas Roessler, 06:47
- Clearsigning considered harmful., Thomas Roessler, 06:44
- Re: bis04, vedaal, 06:33
- Re: bis04, Thomas Roessler, 00:22
April 15, 2002
- Re: bis04, Jon Callas, 17:49
- Re: bis04, Jon Callas, 17:25
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, john . dlugosz, 11:42
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, Hal Finney, 09:53
- Re: bis04, john . dlugosz, 09:04
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, john . dlugosz, 08:31
- bis04, Werner Koch, 07:35
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 04:29
April 11, 2002
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, Jon Callas, 17:38
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, David P. Kemp, 17:06
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, Jon Callas, 15:44
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, john . dlugosz, 15:10
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, john . dlugosz, 15:01
- Re: Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, vedaal, 13:56
- Recipient-verifiable messages, was: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Hal Finney, 08:54
April 10, 2002
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Peter Gutmann, 23:23
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Volker Augustin, 23:14
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Sam Roberts, 19:59
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Keith Moore, 18:34
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Volker Augustin, 14:08
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, john . dlugosz, 12:54
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Marc Mutz, 12:14
- Re: forwarding an encrypted message, David Shaw, 11:12
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Keith Moore, 10:52
- Re: forwarding an encrypted message, vedaal, 10:42
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Marc Mutz, 10:35
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Paul Shields, 10:16
- Re: forwarding an encrypted message, john . dlugosz, 09:29
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Thomas Roessler, 09:24
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, john . dlugosz, 09:22
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, ned . freed, 09:21
- re: forwarding an encrypted message, john . dlugosz, 09:01
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Derek Atkins, 08:52
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Paul Shields, 07:46
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Keith Moore, 06:50
- Re: forwarding an encrypted message, Ben Laurie, 06:41
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Graham Klyne, 02:18
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Magnus von Koeller, 01:33
- Re: forwarding an encrypted message, Matthew Byng-Maddick, 01:06
April 09, 2002
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Jon Callas, 14:30
- Re[2]: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Clinton E. Troutman, 14:08
- re: forwarding an encrypted message, vedaal, 13:39
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, john . dlugosz, 13:33
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Simon Josefsson, 12:33
- RE: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Leon Kuunders, 12:08
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 11:39
- Re: Bug#40394: forwarding an encrypted PGP message is useless, Marc Mutz, 11:16
- Re: OpenPGP public key packet format, john . dlugosz, 08:01