IETF SMTP (date)
March 31, 2008
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Robert A. Rosenberg, 22:20
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Dave Crocker, 21:30
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, Frank Ellermann, 21:03
- Re: dual-stack IP transition is not specific to SMTP, Keith Moore, 20:29
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, John C Klensin, 20:24
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, Keith Moore, 20:18
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, Dave Crocker, 20:05
- Re: nullmx, Frank Ellermann, 19:44
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, ned+ietf-smtp, 18:40
- Re: nullmx, ned+ietf-smtp, 15:33
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:49
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, John R Levine, 14:01
- Re: nullmx, Frank Ellermann, 13:56
- dual-stack IP transition is not specific to SMTP, Dave Crocker, 13:19
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, John Levine, 13:03
- Re: nullmx (was: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis), Mark Andrews, 12:31
- Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change, Willie Gillespie, 11:36
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 11:32
- Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change, SM, 11:15
- Looking for good mail vs. looking for bad mail, John Levine, 10:13
- Re: Defaulting to no mail for IPv6-only hosts, SM, 10:03
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Hector Santos, 09:20
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:18
- nullmx (was: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis), Frank Ellermann, 08:18
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Frank Ellermann, 07:33
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Frank Ellermann, 07:32
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:14
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 05:42
- Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change, Paul Smith, 02:57
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:49
- Defaulting to no mail for IPv6-only hosts, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 02:09
- Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change, SM, 00:19
March 30, 2008
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, Russ Allbery, 23:36
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Mark Andrews, 23:07
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Carl S. Gutekunst, 22:28
- Re: Defaulting to no mail, Jim Fenton, 21:54
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Mark Andrews, 21:53
- Re: Defaulting to no mail, Dave Crocker, 21:43
- Paradigm change?, John Leslie, 21:41
- Re: Defaulting to no mail, John Leslie, 20:54
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, Hector Santos, 20:51
- Re: Defaulting to no mail, John C Klensin, 20:42
- Re: Defaulting to no mail, John Leslie, 20:27
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, John C Klensin, 20:22
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Carl S. Gutekunst, 19:23
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, Dave Crocker, 19:16
- Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change, John C Klensin, 19:15
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, John R Levine, 18:37
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, ned+ietf-smtp, 18:30
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, Dave Crocker, 18:30
- Re: Minor is. It's not a pardigm change, John R Levine, 17:51
- Re: Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change, Frank Ellermann, 17:43
- Minor isn't. It's a pardigm change, Dave Crocker, 17:01
- Re: History of fallback to A, John Levine, 16:23
- Re: History of fallback to A, Russ Allbery, 15:10
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, John R Levine, 14:38
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, ned+ietf-smtp, 14:00
- Re: History of fallback to A, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:37
- Re: History of fallback to A, Russ Allbery, 11:12
- Re: not delivering, and History of fallback to A, John R Levine, 09:59
- Re: History of fallback to A, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:43
- Re: Defaulting to no mail, John Levine, 09:21
- Re: History of fallback to A, ned+ietf-smtp, 08:49
- Re: Defaulting to no mail, Dave Crocker, 08:37
- Re: Defaulting to no mail, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 07:34
March 27, 2008
- Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email, Mark Andrews, 20:03
- Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email, Mark Andrews, 17:51
- Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email, Mark Andrews, 17:39
- Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email, SM, 12:24
- Re: Implicit MX and A RRs, SM, 12:22
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Tony Finch, 06:09
- Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email, Frank Ellermann, 06:01
- Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email, Sabahattin Gucukoglu, 00:51
- Re: Implicit MX and A RRs, Matti Aarnio, 00:20
March 26, 2008
- Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email, Mark Andrews, 19:54
- Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email, Hector Santos, 19:44
- Re: How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email, Mark Andrews, 18:14
- How to mark domains that do / do not wish to receive email, John Leslie, 18:12
- Re: Last Call: draft-klensin-rfc2821bis, Mark Andrews, 16:32
- Re: Implicit MX and A RRs, SM, 12:56
- resolving the last few items for 2821bis, Tony Hansen, 08:14
March 11, 2008
- Re: email-arch -- Security Considerations, ned+ietf-smtp, 16:14
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, ned+ietf-smtp, 15:42
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, Frank Ellermann, 14:08
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, ned+ietf-smtp, 09:10
- RE: email-arch -- Security Considerations, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 08:39
- Re: email-arch -- Security Considerations, Dave Crocker, 08:30
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, Frank Ellermann, 06:40
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, Dave Crocker, 05:28
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, ned+ietf-smtp, 03:07
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, Frank Ellermann, 01:50
March 10, 2008
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, ned+ietf-smtp, 22:19
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, John Levine, 21:48
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, SM, 17:17
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, Dave Crocker, 17:02
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, ned+ietf-smtp, 16:22
- Request for advancement, draft-hansen-4468upd-mailesc-registry-04, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:23
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, Frank Ellermann, 07:00
- Off-topic: Partly unreadable mail from Martin/Eudora, Frank Ellermann, 06:53
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, Dave Crocker, 05:24
- Re: Off-topic: Partly unreadable mail from Martin/Eudora, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 04:22
- Off-topic: Partly unreadable mail from Martin/Eudora, Arnt Gulbrandsen, 03:38
March 09, 2008
- Re: email-arch I18N, Frank Ellermann, 19:49
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 11:10
- email-arch-11-05dc: version for ietf(_at_)phili, extensive changes, Dave Crocker, 07:05
- Re: email-arch I18N, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 06:45
- Re: email-arch I18N, Frank Ellermann, 06:24
- Re: email-arch I18N, Alessandro Vesely, 04:54
March 08, 2008
- email-arch I18N (was: email-arch -- Security Considerations), Frank Ellermann, 22:32
- Re: email-arch -- Security Considerations, Hector Santos, 22:30
- Re: email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, John Levine, 22:25
- email-arch -- Security Considerations, Dave Crocker, 20:39
- email-arch -- comments solicited on I8N, Dave Crocker, 20:37