IRTF Anti-spam Research Group (date)

IRTF Anti-spam Research Group (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

December 24, 2008

Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Barry Shein, 20:11
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), mathew, 13:52

December 17, 2008

Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Barry Shein, 16:48
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Alessandro Vesely, 06:00

December 16, 2008

Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), David Nicol, 12:25
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Alessandro Vesely, 09:38

December 15, 2008

Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Steve Atkins, 19:49
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, John Levine, 16:52
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Michael Thomas, 16:13
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, J.D. Falk, 15:32
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Chris Lewis, 13:59
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Michael Thomas, 12:46
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Steve Atkins, 12:19
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), John Johnson, 12:09
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Alessandro Vesely, 06:31

December 14, 2008

Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Daniel Feenberg, 18:16
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Chris Lewis, 17:30
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Franck Martin, 16:04
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Rich Kulawiec, 15:24
[Asrg] Internet Draft -- SMTP Postage Extension, John Leslie, 06:59

December 09, 2008

Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Douglas Otis, 13:06

December 08, 2008

Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Michael Thomas, 20:01

December 05, 2008

Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Douglas Otis, 18:35
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, David Nicol, 14:55
Re: [Asrg] publish or perish, was The fundamental misconception, David Nicol, 14:47

December 04, 2008

Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Seth, 22:42
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, der Mouse, 22:27
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Chris Lewis, 21:32
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE publish or perish, was The fundamental misconception, John Levine, 19:16
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, J.D. Falk, 18:56
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, J.D. Falk, 18:48
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Chris Lewis, 15:47
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Chris Lewis, 15:41
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Dave CROCKER, 15:24
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Chris Lewis, 14:24
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Chris Lewis, 14:22
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Dave CROCKER, 14:02
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, der Mouse, 13:54
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Dave CROCKER, 13:30
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Seth, 13:29
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Chris Lewis, 13:29
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Chris Lewis, 13:16
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Barry Shein, 12:29
Re: [Asrg] differential confidence, Steve Atkins, 11:43
[Asrg] differential confidence, Dave CROCKER, 11:31
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Chris Lewis, 11:19
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Seth, 10:29
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Rich Kulawiec, 08:14
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Rich Kulawiec, 06:51
Re: [Asrg] publish or perish, was The fundamental misconception, Gerald Klaas, 00:58

December 03, 2008

Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Seth, 23:24
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Steve Atkins, 22:52
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Barry Shein, 22:30
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, Barry Shein, 22:25
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Rich Kulawiec, 21:42
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, Bart Schaefer, 21:24
Re: [Asrg] publish or perish, was The fundamental misconception, John Levine, 20:07
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, David Nicol, 18:28
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, David Nicol, 18:22
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), David Nicol, 18:06
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein, 17:18
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein, 17:18
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, Gerald Klaas, 17:05
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Steve Atkins, 16:39
Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz, 16:34
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Barry Shein, 16:32
Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Matthias Leisi, 16:29
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, John Levine, 16:27
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Alessandro Vesely, 14:42
Re: [Asrg] Mailing list signup handshakes, Alessandro Vesely, 14:42
Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, SM, 14:38
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, Gerald Klaas, 14:30
Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Chris Lewis, 13:23
Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz, 12:52
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Michael Thomas, 11:48
Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, SM, 11:44
[Asrg] The fundamental misconception about POSTAGE METERS, Bart Schaefer, 11:34
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Jeff Macdonald, 11:25
Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz, 11:20
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), J.D. Falk, 11:05
Re: [Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, J.D. Falk, 11:03
[Asrg] Redirection at SMTP session, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz, 10:24
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Rich Kulawiec, 09:31
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Paul Russell, 09:30
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Paul Russell, 08:56
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), John Levine, 07:20
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine, 07:08
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein, 05:58
Re: [Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), J.D. Falk, 05:16
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, J.D. Falk, 05:12
Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, J.D. Falk, 05:08

December 02, 2008

[Asrg] A paper/project worth considering (found it!), Rich Kulawiec, 20:46
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Rich Kulawiec, 20:29
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Rich Kulawiec, 20:12
Re: [Asrg] ASRG progress? META-DISCUSSION(META-DISCUSSION(POSTAGE)), Dave CROCKER, 20:12
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine, 19:56
Re: [Asrg] ASRG progress? META-DISCUSSION(META-DISCUSSION(POSTAGE)), Barry Shein, 19:43
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Barry Shein, 19:42
Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Barry Shein, 19:42
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein, 19:42
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein, 19:41
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Barry Shein, 19:41
Re: [Asrg] Projecting [POSTAGE], Barry Shein, 19:40
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein, 19:40
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail [NOTHING TO DO WITH: postage], Barry Shein, 19:40
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail POSTAGE, Barry Shein, 19:39
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Barry Shein, 19:39
Re: [Asrg] ASRG progress?, John Levine, 19:36
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Douglas Otis, 16:43
Re: [Asrg] ASRG progress?, SM, 13:13
[Asrg] ASRG progress?, Dave CROCKER, 12:37
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Dave CROCKER, 12:29
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Gerald Klaas, 11:36
Re: [Asrg] Double-spending of electronic coins, Bart Schaefer, 11:32
Re: [Asrg] Double-spending of electronic coins, Gerald Klaas, 11:01
[Asrg] Double-spending of electronic coins, John Leslie, 09:12
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Bart Schaefer, 02:16
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Andrew D Kirch, 01:25
Re: [Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Lyndon Nerenberg, 01:15
[Asrg] Solving spam == Solving zombies/botnets, Walter Dnes, 01:08

December 01, 2008

Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine, 20:23
Re: [Asrg] The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, David Nicol, 15:46
Re: [Asrg] Projecting, Douglas Otis, 14:04
Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, David Nicol, 13:23
Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Dave CROCKER, 12:30
Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Tony Hansen, 12:06
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Bart Schaefer, 11:24
Re: [Asrg] is SMTP still really store-and-forward ?, Dave CROCKER, 10:47
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, John Levine, 09:27
Re: [Asrg] POSTAGE, was The fundamental misconception about paying for mail, Bart Schaefer, 01:32