IETF 822 (date)
April 15, 1992
- [no subject], 5557, 23:22
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Makr Keasling, 21:52
- Re: multipart partial messages, Einar Stefferud, 17:10
- Allowable-Degradation-Percentage header, Bill Janssen, 14:43
- Re: multipart partial messages, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 14:37
- Acknowledgements. (was Implications of MIME for Transport), Neil W Rickert, 14:11
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Rens Troost, 13:26
- Transport and MIME, MIME and transport, John C Klensin, 13:23
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Einar Stefferud, 13:09
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Nathaniel Borenstein, 12:11
- multipart partial messages, Jay C. Weber, 12:05
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Einar Stefferud, 11:21
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Einar Stefferud, 11:10
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, jknowles, 10:45
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, david, 10:24
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, david, 10:15
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Steve Hardcastle-Kille, 10:04
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Nathaniel Borenstein, 09:24
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Guido van Rossum, 09:04
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Craig_Everhart, 08:10
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Marshall Rose, 08:10
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:47
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:46
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Guido van Rossum, 05:25
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Steve Hardcastle-Kille, 01:59
April 14, 1992
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Marshall Rose, 22:35
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, david, 19:02
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Einar Stefferud, 15:11
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Mark Crispin, 11:58
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Craig_Everhart, 11:10
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Nathaniel Borenstein, 10:31
- Re: Network World, braden, 10:03
- Re: Implications of MIME for Transport, Craig_Everhart, 09:52
- Implications of MIME for Transport, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:41
- New mailcap document, Nathaniel Borenstein, 07:44
- Re: Network World, John Noerenberg, 07:36
- Re: Network World, Nathaniel Borenstein, 06:24
April 08, 1992
- Extension to MIME, John F. Chandler, 21:50
- mnemonic and charsets, Erik M. van der Poel, 19:44
- Re: Q+A: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 08:36
- Re: Q+A: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, John C Klensin, 05:04
- Re: Q+A: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Erik M. van der Poel, 01:49
April 02, 1992
- Delayed in the mail, Dave Crocker, 14:22
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 12:24
- Re: Q+A: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 12:05
- Re: Q+A: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Greg Vaudreuil, 11:56
- Re: Q+A: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 11:36
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Dave Crocker, 11:15
- Q+A: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Greg Vaudreuil, 09:20
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:16
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 08:07
- FYI: more details on Vietnamese mnemonics, Randall Atkinson, 08:03
- Re: Last Call: Multipurpose Mail Extensions to Proposed Standard, James M Galvin, 05:50
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, John C Klensin, 01:46
April 01, 1992
- Re: mime formats and versions in format specifications, Larry Masinter, 23:47
- clarification re: mnemonic to proposed standard, Keith Moore, 22:20
- Re: Last Call: Multipurpose Mail Extensions to Proposed Standard, Ned Freed, Postmaster, 20:19
- Re: Last Call: Multipurpose Mail Extensions to Proposed Standard, david, 15:52
- Re: Working Group Last Call: Mnemonic to Proposed Standard, AXELSSON, 05:47