nmh Workers (date)
December 30, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Setting minimum automake version., Ken Hornstein, 17:29
- [Nmh-workers] Setting minimum automake version., Lyndon Nerenberg, 17:04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Setting minimum automake version., Tethys, 17:00
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Setting minimum automake version., Lyndon Nerenberg, 16:59
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Setting minimum automake version., Ken Hornstein, 16:57
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Setting minimum automake version., Lyndon Nerenberg, 16:49
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Setting minimum automake version., Ken Hornstein, 16:48
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Setting minimum automake version., Lyndon Nerenberg, 14:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Setting minimum automake version., Ken Hornstein, 14:46
- [Nmh-workers] Setting minimum automake version., Lyndon Nerenberg, 14:18
- Re: [Nmh-workers] [Nmh-commits] [SCM] The nmh Mail Handling System branch, master, updated. 1.5-branchpoint-332-g91954f9, Lyndon Nerenberg, 14:10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] [Nmh-commits] [SCM] The nmh Mail Handling System branch, master, updated. 1.5-branchpoint-332-g91954f9, Ken Hornstein, 14:07
December 25, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() interface, David Levine, 19:14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] fpurge(), Paul Vixie, 14:57
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() interface, Paul Vixie, 14:57
- [Nmh-workers] fpurge(), David Levine, 12:17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld() interface, David Levine, 11:59
December 19, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, rader, 22:35
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, Ken Hornstein, 22:11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, rader, 21:52
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, Ken Hornstein, 19:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, David Levine, 16:04
- [Nmh-workers] another MIME failure, this time it's the C-T, rader, 15:39
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Help: 8-bit: I'm confused and befuddled., Ken Hornstein, 10:07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Help: 8-bit: I'm confused and befuddled., norm, 09:28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ralph Corderoy, 04:59
December 18, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ken Hornstein, 21:36
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, David Levine, 14:12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Harald Geyer, 14:05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Help: 8-bit: I'm confused and befuddled., Ken Hornstein, 10:19
- [Nmh-workers] Help: 8-bit: I'm confused and befuddled., norm, 09:52
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ken Hornstein, 07:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, David Levine, 07:28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ralph Corderoy, 07:23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Harald Geyer, 07:14
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ken Hornstein, 06:40
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ralph Corderoy, 06:11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Tethys, 02:51
December 17, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Lyndon Nerenberg, 22:46
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ken Hornstein, 20:31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Lyndon Nerenberg, 19:31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ralph Corderoy, 18:16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Lyndon Nerenberg, 18:05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ken Hornstein, 17:24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Lyndon Nerenberg, 16:33
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, David Levine, 16:29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Lyndon Nerenberg, 16:29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Ken Hornstein, 09:09
- [Nmh-workers] Quoted printable problem, Johan Viklund, 05:14
December 11, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Git Annoyances, Lyndon Nerenberg, 21:48
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Git Annoyances, Tom Lane, 21:35
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Git Annoyances, Ken Hornstein, 21:21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ken Hornstein, 20:39
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Git Annoyances, Lyndon Nerenberg, 20:29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Git Annoyances, David Levine, 20:22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Git Annoyances, Paul Fox, 20:20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Lyndon Nerenberg, 20:12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Lyndon Nerenberg, 20:07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Ken Hornstein, 20:04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Lyndon Nerenberg, 19:59
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., chad, 19:57
- [Nmh-workers] Git Annoyances, Lyndon Nerenberg, 19:53
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Lyndon Nerenberg, 19:48
- [Nmh-workers] Pessimal Optimizations., Lyndon Nerenberg, 19:25
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ralph Corderoy, 18:54
- Re: [Nmh-workers] msh, C.M. Connelly, 14:43
- [Nmh-workers] rbmhshow?, Ken Hornstein, 09:17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Jon Steinhart, 09:10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 09:05
December 10, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] An nmh standard compliance tool, Ken Hornstein, 22:57
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ken Hornstein, 22:54
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Jon Steinhart, 22:54
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ken Hornstein, 22:51
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Paul Vixie, 22:47
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Paul Vixie, 22:43
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ken Hornstein, 22:32
- [Nmh-workers] MIME user interface (was: Re: 78 column limit), Ken Hornstein, 22:29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Lyndon Nerenberg, 21:32
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 21:06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] msh, David Levine, 20:38
- [Nmh-workers] An nmh standard compliance tool, norm, 11:30
- [Nmh-workers] msh, norm, 11:07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, markus schnalke, 01:56
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, markus schnalke, 01:40
December 09, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Paul Vixie, 22:38
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 20:17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 20:07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ken Hornstein, 19:52
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 19:44
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ken Hornstein, 19:40
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, P Vixie, 19:28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, P Vixie, 19:24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Paul Fox, 19:01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 18:45
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ken Hornstein, 18:00
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 17:16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ken Hornstein, 16:31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Ken Hornstein, 15:53
- Re: [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, David Levine, 14:01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshowing a specific mime part, Paul Fox, 12:06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Announce: Release of mmh-0.1 (meillo's mail handler), Paul Vixie, 11:58
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Announce: Release of mmh-0.1 (meillo's mail handler), Ralph Corderoy, 05:53
December 08, 2012
- [Nmh-workers] m_getfld, Lyndon Nerenberg, 18:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Markus' Thesis as a Discussion Point, Ken Hornstein, 18:44
- [Nmh-workers] Markus' Thesis as a Discussion Point, Lyndon Nerenberg, 18:27
- [Nmh-workers] Announce: Release of mmh-0.1 (meillo's mail handler), markus schnalke, 17:15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Documenting @folder WAS Re: relative messagenumbers?, David Levine, 10:39
December 06, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Bill Wohler, 23:52
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshowing a specific mime part, Paul Fox, 23:04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshowing a specific mime part, Ken Hornstein, 22:19
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 12:07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Oliver Kiddle, 11:51
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshowing a specific mime part, Paul Fox, 10:43
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Michael Richardson, 07:48
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Paul Fox, 07:12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshowing a specific mime part, Paul Fox, 07:09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 05:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 05:43
- Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshowing a specific mime part, Ralph Corderoy, 05:27
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 05:22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Ralph Corderoy, 05:19
- [Nmh-workers] mhshowing a specific mime part, Paul Fox, 00:57
December 05, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A Call For Pre-nmh MH Documentation, Bill Wohler, 23:10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A Call For Pre-nmh MH Documentation, Lyndon Nerenberg, 22:59
- Re: [Nmh-workers] A Call For Pre-nmh MH Documentation, Bill Wohler, 22:33
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Bill Wohler, 22:23
- [Nmh-workers] mhshowing a specific mime part, Paul Fox, 22:19
- [Nmh-workers] Better repl -group support, Ken Hornstein, 20:52
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 20:36
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 20:32
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 20:29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 20:24
- [Nmh-workers] A Call For Pre-nmh MH Documentation, Lyndon Nerenberg, 20:13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 19:35
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 19:29
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Ken Hornstein, 19:22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 19:12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 19:11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 19:04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 19:01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 19:00
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Lyndon Nerenberg, 18:20
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 17:24
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 17:16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Lyndon Nerenberg, 17:10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Earl Hood, 16:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 15:48
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 15:42
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Ralph Corderoy, 15:37
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Ralph Corderoy, 15:23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 15:16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 14:42
- Re: [Nmh-workers] E flag in scan output & the wayback machine, norm, 14:41
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 14:37
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Paul Fox, 14:36
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, David Levine, 14:28
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Paul Fox, 13:51
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Ken Hornstein, 13:42
- Re: [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Ralph Corderoy, 13:31
- [Nmh-workers] pick -nosequence ?, Paul Fox, 13:17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 13:02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 12:32
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 12:16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 11:35
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 11:32
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ralph Corderoy, 11:06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attachments inside the html part, Paul Fox, 10:36
- Re: [Nmh-workers] attachments inside the html part, Ralph Corderoy, 10:31
- [Nmh-workers] attachments inside the html part, Paul Fox, 10:26
December 04, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 21:13
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Michael Richardson, 20:39
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Michael Richardson, 20:15
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 19:44
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 14:32
- [Nmh-workers] E flag in scan output & the wayback machine, Ken Hornstein, 14:32
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 14:31
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, paul vixie, 14:26
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 14:23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Lyndon Nerenberg, 14:23
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 13:47
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Ken Hornstein, 13:41
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 12:50
- Re: [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, Jon Steinhart, 12:46
- [Nmh-workers] 78 column limit, norm, 12:43
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ralph Corderoy, 11:34
- Re: [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, Ken Hornstein, 09:49
- [Nmh-workers] UTF=8 in message bodies, norm, 09:28
December 03, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] $editalt and -noatfile, Ken Hornstein, 21:08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] $editalt and -noatfile, David Levine, 19:01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] $editalt and -noatfile, Ken Hornstein, 13:55
- Re: [Nmh-workers] $editalt and -noatfile, David Levine, 08:48
- [Nmh-workers] $editalt and -noatfile, Oliver Kiddle, 04:34
December 02, 2012
- Re: [Nmh-workers] rmmproc Not Used for Lots of Messages; refile Copies., David Levine, 10:08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] rmmproc Not Used for Lots of Messages; refile Copies., Ken Hornstein, 09:56
- Re: [Nmh-workers] rmmproc Not Used for Lots of Messages; refile Copies., David Levine, 09:32
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Documenting @folder WAS Re: relative messagenumbers?, David Levine, 09:21
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Documenting @folder WAS Re: relative message numbers?, Ralph Corderoy, 07:24