Procmail (date)
May 30, 2004
- Re: Re: (address cycling) CLEANTO anyone?, Don Hammond, 21:11
- Re: (address cycling) Re: CLEANTO anyone?, Professional Software Engineering, 17:12
- Re: confirm 209ee18906458f4d13ae1f8b51821b6c723eaa98, LuKreme, 17:12
- Re: (address cycling) Re: CLEANTO anyone?, Don Hammond, 14:51
- Re: Re: CLEANTO anyone?, Don Hammond, 13:30
- Re: address cycling, David W. Tamkin, 06:37
- Re: CLEANTO anyone?, Professional Software Engineering, 03:21
- (address cycling) Re: CLEANTO anyone?, Professional Software Engineering, 03:11
- Re: CLEANTO anyone?, Jim Osborn, 02:19
May 29, 2004
- Re: CLEANTO anyone?, Don Hammond, 22:10
- CLEANTO anyone?, Jim Osborn, 20:40
- Re: debugging \<(xxx|yyy|zzz)\>, Jim Osborn, 16:35
- pattern for didtheyreadit.com-tracked mail?, David W. Tamkin, 10:48
- Re: Recipe on "subject contains", David W. Tamkin, 10:39
- Re: Recipe on "subject contains", Professional Software Engineering, 10:25
- Re: Recipe on "subject contains", David W. Tamkin, 07:58
- | formail -D 8192 $HOME/.procmail/msgid.cache, Michelle Konzack, 07:17
- Re: debugging \<(xxx|yyy|zzz)\>, David W. Tamkin, 07:04
- Re: debugging \<(xxx|yyy|zzz)\>, Dallman Ross, 03:40
- Re: debugging \<(xxx|yyy|zzz)\>, Cyrille Lefevre, 03:17
- Re: auto-verify PGP/MIME messages, Cyrille Lefevre, 03:00
- global and $USER procmailrc ?, Michelle Konzack, 02:56
May 28, 2004
- Re: debugging \<(xxx|yyy|zzz)\>, Jim Osborn, 21:36
- Re: auto-verify PGP/MIME messages, Cyrille Lefevre, 20:26
- RE: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Dallman Ross, 16:25
- Re: debugging \<(xxx|yyy|zzz)\>, David W. Tamkin, 16:25
- Re: Recipe on "subject contains", Holger Wahlen, 16:25
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, procmail, 15:35
- Re: debugging \<(xxx|yyy|zzz)\>, Jim Osborn, 15:35
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Kai Schaetzl, 15:15
- Re: debugging \<(xxx|yyy|zzz)\>, David W. Tamkin, 14:41
- Re: debugging \<(xxx|yyy|zzz)\>, Professional Software Engineering, 14:30
- debugging \<(xxx|yyy|zzz)\>, Jim Osborn, 13:31
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Dallman Ross, 13:16
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, multimedia-fan, 13:01
- Re: Recipe on "subject contains", David W. Tamkin, 12:26
- Re: Recipe on "subject contains", Professional Software Engineering, 11:26
- Re: Recipe on "subject contains", Professional Software Engineering, 11:21
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Professional Software Engineering, 11:16
- Re: Recipe on "subject contains", David W. Tamkin, 09:25
- Re: Recipe on "subject contains", Hans du Plooy, 09:11
- Re: Recipy on "subject contains", Hans du Plooy, 08:43
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Kai Schaetzl, 08:43
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Kai Schaetzl, 08:43
- Re[2]: Recipe on "subject contains", Gerald V. Livingston II, 08:43
- Re: Recipe on "subject contains", David W. Tamkin, 08:00
- Re[2]: Recipy on "subject contains", Gerald V. Livingston II, 07:36
- Re: Recipy on "subject contains", Professional Software Engineering, 07:36
- Re: Recipy on "subject contains", Scott Wiersdorf, 07:11
- Recipy on "subject contains" [solved], Hans du Plooy, 06:16
- Recipy on "subject contains", Hans du Plooy, 06:03
May 27, 2004
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, multimedia-fan, 17:34
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, multimedia-fan, 17:34
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Lars Hecking, 05:49
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Dallman Ross, 05:08
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Kai Schaetzl, 04:51
May 26, 2004
- Re: Filtering a Kana system?, Dragoncrest, 15:29
- Re: SHELL= does not correctly override user's login shell, R A Lichtensteiger, 15:08
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, multimedia-fan, 13:02
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Kai Schaetzl, 06:50
- FW: iNCORRECT SENDMAIL OPTION, CRACK SE, 02:39
May 25, 2004
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Professional Software Engineering, 21:43
- Re: Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Scott Wiersdorf, 20:42
- Rule to filter for letter-number combinations?, Jim Witte, 19:29
- Re: SHELL= does not correctly override user's login shell, David W. Tamkin, 17:12
- Re: SHELL= does not correctly override user's login shell, Michael J Wise, 15:51
- Re: SHELL= does not correctly override user's login shell, Dan Hollis, 15:22
- Re: SHELL= does not correctly override user's login shell, Michael J Wise, 15:10
- Re: SHELL= does not correctly override user's login shell, Dan Hollis, 15:06
- Re: SHELL= does not correctly override user's login shell, Michael J Wise, 14:40
- SHELL= does not correctly override user's login shell, Dan Hollis, 14:08
May 24, 2004
- Re: Can variables be nested?, Jim Osborn, 17:55
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, David W. Tamkin, 13:56
- Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Kai Schaetzl, 13:44
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, maillists, 13:44
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Kai Schaetzl, 13:44
- RE: Can variables be nested?, Gary Funck, 11:37
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Dallman Ross, 10:25
- Re: Filtering a Kana system?, Professional Software Engineering, 09:21
- Re: Confused newbie...., Scott Wiersdorf, 08:40
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, David W. Tamkin, 08:40
- Filtering a Kana system?, Dragoncrest, 08:40
- Re: Confused newbie...., David W. Tamkin, 08:32
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - NOW FORMAIL PATH, Jack L. Stone, 08:21
- RE: Confused newbie...., Steffen Bisgaard, 08:04
- Re: Confused newbie...., Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:04
- Re: Confused newbie...., Scott Wiersdorf, 07:52
- Confused newbie...., Steffen Bisgaard, 07:40
- Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Michelle Konzack, 07:00
- Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Kai Schaetzl, 06:40
- Re: Attachments to the list + good spam info Was: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Kai Schaetzl, 06:40
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:09
- Re: Attachments to the list + good spam info Was: Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Dallman Ross, 05:51
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Kai Schaetzl, 05:38
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Kai Schaetzl, 05:38
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, maillists, 05:38
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - NOW FORMAIL PATH, maillists, 05:38
- Re: Clam through procmail., Dallman Ross, 05:38
- Clam through procmail., Hans du Plooy, 05:12
- Re: Attachments to the list + good spam info Was: Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Michelle Konzack, 05:12
- Softlabs AV, Hans du Plooy, 04:45
- Attachments to the list + good spam info Was: Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Gerald V. Livingston II, 02:45
- Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Michelle Konzack, 02:27
- Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Michelle Konzack, 02:27
May 23, 2004
- Re[2]: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Professional Software Engineering, 23:54
- Re[2]: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Gerald V. Livingston II, 19:04
- Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:35
- Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Michelle Konzack, 12:58
- Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Michelle Konzack, 12:58
- Re: What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:26
- What is the most efficient way to query an RBL?, Linux, 12:19
May 22, 2004
- Can variables be nested?, Jim Osborn, 15:25
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - NOW FORMAIL PATH, Professional Software Engineering, 10:26
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - NOW FORMAIL PATH, Dallman Ross, 09:34
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - NOW FORMAIL PATH, Jack L. Stone, 09:04
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Jack L. Stone, 08:49
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Jack L. Stone, 08:01
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Dallman Ross, 02:54
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, maillists, 01:50
May 21, 2004
- Re: configuring sendmail and procmail, Kai Schaetzl, 15:42
- Re: newbie problem with default delivery, Guido Van Hoecke, 15:12
- Re: newbie problem with default delivery, Professional Software Engineering, 12:53
- Re: newbie problem with default delivery, Guido Van Hoecke, 12:02
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Dallman Ross, 10:25
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Dallman Ross, 10:25
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Jack L. Stone, 08:25
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Jack L. Stone, 08:25
- configuring sendmail and procmail, CRACK SE, 07:49
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, David W. Tamkin, 07:33
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:10
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Kai Schaetzl, 06:53
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Cyrille Lefevre, 06:41
May 20, 2004
- Re: newbie problem with default delivery, Professional Software Engineering, 13:09
- Re: newbie problem with default delivery, Dallman Ross, 12:55
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Dallman Ross, 12:42
- newbie problem with default delivery, Guido Van Hoecke, 12:27
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Jack L. Stone, 09:46
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Professional Software Engineering, 09:04
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" - The VERBOSE LOG, Jack L. Stone, 08:27
May 19, 2004
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Ruud H.G. van Tol, 14:40
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Professional Software Engineering, 14:12
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Professional Software Engineering, 14:12
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Ruud H.G. van Tol, 14:03
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Kai Schaetzl, 13:49
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Jack L. Stone, 12:43
- Re: How can I tell procmail to read x amount of lines in the body?, Kai Schaetzl, 12:39
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Dallman Ross, 12:01
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Professional Software Engineering, 11:46
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Jack L. Stone, 10:42
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Professional Software Engineering, 09:26
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery" -- AHAH! Triples!, Jack L. Stone, 08:10
- Re: How can I tell procmail to read x amount of lines in the body?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:05
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Jack L. Stone, 07:34
- How can I tell procmail to read x amount of lines in the body?, Linux, 07:34
- Re: Mailbox type / Folders, Kai Schaetzl, 06:51
- AW: AW: Mailbox type / Folders, Robert & Sabine von Knobloch, 04:25
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, CRACK SE, 04:18
- Re: AW: Mailbox type / Folders, Nancy McGough, 03:57
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Dallman Ross, 02:53
- AW: Mailbox type / Folders, Robert & Sabine von Knobloch, 02:21
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, CRACK SE, 01:06
May 18, 2004
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, Professional Software Engineering, 22:39
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, CRACK SE, 22:20
- Re: A Duplicates "Mystery", Michael J Wise, 19:50
- A Duplicates "Mystery", Jack L. Stone, 19:24
- Re: binary garbage logged with some formail operations, Kai Schaetzl, 18:08
- Re: Yahoo Domain Keys., Dan Hollis, 17:10
- Re: How to do non-filter actions correctly?, Kai Schaetzl, 16:41
- Yahoo Domain Keys., multimedia-fan, 16:31
- Re: Duplicates?, Marvin Pierce, 15:54
- Re: Duplicates?, Professional Software Engineering, 15:33
- Re: Use scoring to determine header format?, Professional Software Engineering, 15:33
- Re: Duplicates?, Marvin Pierce, 14:30
- Re: Use scoring to determine header format?, fleet, 13:53
- Re: auto-verify PGP/MIME messages, Professional Software Engineering, 11:23
- Re: Duplicates?, R A Lichtensteiger, 10:49
- auto-verify PGP/MIME messages, Cyrille Lefevre, 10:49
- Re: Use scoring to determine header format?, Professional Software Engineering, 10:16
- Re: Duplicates?, Professional Software Engineering, 10:16
- Re: Mailbox type / Folders, Kai Schaetzl, 08:40
- Re: Use scoring to determine header format?, fleet, 08:30
- Re: Mailbox type / Folders, Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist, 07:40
- Re: Mailbox type / Folders, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:40
- Mailbox type / Folders, bob, 07:19
- Re: mydomain, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:07
- Re: mydomain (was: Nesting), Kai Schaetzl, 02:43
- Re: Use scoring to determine header format?, Dallman Ross, 01:13
- Re: Simplifying a Recipe?, Marvin Pierce, 00:38
- Duplicates?, mrpierce, 00:22
May 17, 2004
- Re: Simplifying a Recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 23:56
- Re: Simplifying a Recipe?, Marvin Pierce, 23:33
- Re: Use scoring to determine header format?, Professional Software Engineering, 23:07
- Re: Simplifying a Recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 23:07
- Re: Use scoring to determine header format?, Scott Wiersdorf, 20:45
- Re: Simplifying a Recipe?, Marvin Pierce, 20:17
- Re: Simplifying a Recipe?, Professional Software Engineering, 19:55
- Re: Use scoring to determine header format?, fleet, 19:45
- Simplifying a Recipe?, Marvin Pierce, 19:04
- Re: How to do non-filter actions correctly?, Professional Software Engineering, 18:03
- mydomain (was: Re: Nesting), Professional Software Engineering, 18:03
- How to do non-filter actions correctly?, Kai Schaetzl, 17:29
- Re: Nesting, Dallman Ross, 16:35
- Nesting, Doug Essinger-Hileman, 16:09
- Re: Use scoring to determine header format?, Professional Software Engineering, 15:15
- Use scoring to determine header format?, fleet, 14:01
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, Kai Schaetzl, 09:44
- procmail v3.22 moving to fedora and postfix, Udi Mottelo, 09:09
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, Professional Software Engineering, 08:20
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, CRACK SE, 07:45
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, Dallman Ross, 07:10
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, CRACK SE, 07:03
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, Dallman Ross, 06:30
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, Cyrille Lefevre, 05:39
- Re: PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, Eric Wood, 05:32
- PROCMAIL NOT CONFIGURED WITH SENDMAIL, CRACK SE, 04:59
May 16, 2004
- Re: Isolating the hyphen - AAAARRRRRRRGHH!, fleet, 12:44
- binary garbage logged with some formail operations, Kai Schaetzl, 11:54
- Re: Isolating the hyphen, Professional Software Engineering, 11:43
- Re: Isolating the hyphen, Dallman Ross, 10:52
- Isolating the hyphen, fleet, 10:26
- Re: Interpreting the 'w' flag, Skip Montanaro, 06:40
- Re: Interpreting the 'w' flag, Professional Software Engineering, 01:04
May 15, 2004
- Interpreting the 'w' flag, Skip Montanaro, 20:05
- Re: Recipe B: ?, Scott Wiersdorf, 17:16
- Recipe B: ?, Marvin R. Pierce, 16:39
- Re: ruminations on spam filtering, Jay Moore, 14:23
- Re: ruminations on spam filtering, Patrick Shanahan, 13:33
- Re: ruminations on spam filtering, Jay Moore, 13:11
- Re: ruminations on spam filtering, Professional Software Engineering, 10:41
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:17
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Dallman Ross, 04:01
May 14, 2004
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:16
- Re: ruminations on spam filtering, Jay Moore, 16:27
- ruminations on spam filtering, Professional Software Engineering, 15:12
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, David W. Tamkin, 10:03
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:56
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:54
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:54
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Dallman Ross, 06:37
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, David W. Tamkin, 06:16
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Dallman Ross, 05:41
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:32
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Dallman Ross, 04:45
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Dallman Ross, 04:14
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Dallman Ross, 04:14
May 13, 2004
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Michael D Schleif, 20:27
- Re: Clam virus scanning through procmail, Eric Wood, 20:15
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Professional Software Engineering, 20:15
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, David W. Tamkin, 19:49
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Michael D Schleif, 19:26
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Dallman Ross, 17:09
- Re: pluggable modules? (dev idea), Dan Hollis, 16:48
- Re: pluggable modules? (dev idea), Dallman Ross, 16:40
- Re: host query optimization?, Dallman Ross, 16:31
- Re: pluggable modules? (dev idea), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:11
- Re: Clam virus scanning through procmail, Scott Wiersdorf, 16:02
- Re: pluggable modules? (dev idea), Dan Hollis, 15:47
- Clam virus scanning through procmail, Kenneth Andresen, 15:38
- Re: pluggable modules? (dev idea), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 15:01
- host query optimization?, Professional Software Engineering, 14:10
- pluggable modules? (dev idea), Professional Software Engineering, 14:08
- Re: capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 10:30
- capturing the OR that succeeds ???, Michael D Schleif, 10:02
- Re: How to generate a virus warning to the recipient(s)?, Professional Software Engineering, 01:53
- Re: Delivered-To: and/or X-Envelope-To:, Dallman Ross, 00:32
- Re: How to generate a virus warning to the recipient(s)?, Oliver Thiele, 00:20
- Re: Delivered-To: and/or X-Envelope-To:, Nancy McGough, 00:20
- Re: Delivered-To: and/or X-Envelope-To:, Scott Wiersdorf, 00:09
May 11, 2004
- Re: How to generate a virus warning to the recipient(s)?, Professional Software Engineering, 15:55
- Re: How to generate a virus warning to the recipient(s)?, Oliver Thiele, 13:23
- Re: How to generate a virus warning to the recipient(s)?, Professional Software Engineering, 10:15
- Re: sed question, Cyrille Lefevre, 03:32
- Re: How to generate a virus warning to the recipient(s)?, Oliver Thiele, 00:48
May 10, 2004
- Re: How to generate a virus warning to the recipient(s)?, Michelle Konzack, 13:58
- OT: sed question, Eric Wood, 13:58
- RE: Can These 2 Recipes Be Or'd?, Dallman Ross, 10:34
- Re: How to generate a virus warning to the recipient(s)?, Professional Software Engineering, 09:38
- Re: Can These 2 Recipes Be Or'd?, David W. Tamkin, 09:38
- How to generate a virus warning to the recipient(s)?, Oliver Thiele, 03:31
- Re: Can These 2 Recipes Be Or'd?, Dallman Ross, 02:46
May 09, 2004
- Re: Can These 2 Recipes Be Or'd?, Marvin Pierce, 23:35
- Re: Can These 2 Recipes Be Or'd?, David W. Tamkin, 19:57
- Re: Can These 2 Recipes Be Or'd?, Marvin Pierce, 19:40
- Re: Can These 2 Recipes Be Or'd?, David W. Tamkin, 19:10
- Re: Can These 2 Recipes Be Or'd?, Dallman Ross, 16:23
- Can These 2 Recipes Be Or'd?, Marvin R. Pierce, 15:45
May 06, 2004
- Re: Seemingly simple rule won't work, Udi Mottelo, 04:33
- Re: exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., Udi Mottelo, 02:54
- Re: exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., Udi Mottelo, 02:35
- Re: Seemingly simple rule won't work, Nancy McGough, 01:57
- Seemingly simple rule won't work, Hans du Plooy, 01:07
May 05, 2004
- Re: exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., LuKreme, 22:10
- Re: exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., Professional Software Engineering, 17:35
- Re: exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., Professional Software Engineering, 16:58
- Re: exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., Jostein Berntsen, 15:34
- Re: always delivering internally sent email, Professional Software Engineering, 13:14
- Re: always delivering internally sent email, Eric Wood, 11:26
- Re: always delivering internally sent email, David W. Tamkin, 10:50
- Re: No postings to the list for 6 days?, Professional Software Engineering, 10:33
- Re: always delivering internally sent email, Professional Software Engineering, 10:33
- Re: always delivering internally sent email, Eric Wood, 08:54
- Re: exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., Eric Wood, 08:36
- No postings to the list for 6 days?, Chuck Campbell, 08:19
- Re: exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., Dallman Ross, 05:27
- Re: exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., Udi Mottelo, 04:42
- Re: exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., Robert Allerstorfer, 04:15
- exclude a local user from anti-spam/virus procmail testing., Obantec Support, 03:15
May 04, 2004
- Re: Running ?, Professional Software Engineering, 19:59
- Re: Running ?, Marvin Pierce, 19:49
- Re: Running ?, Patrick Shanahan, 19:47
- Re: I'm Sick of This!, Marvin Pierce, 18:11
- Running ?, Marvin Pierce, 18:11
- Re: I'm Sick of This!, Professional Software Engineering, 17:37
- Re: I'm Sick of This!, Eric Wood, 12:26
- I'm Sick of This!, Marvin Pierce, 11:38
May 01, 2004
- "Newbie Q's": 'extraneous locking' in log? - putting return char in log, Jim Witte, 22:17
- Re: Mixed domains, Dallman Ross, 15:23
- Re: Mixed domains, fleet, 14:34
- Re: Mixed domains, Professional Software Engineering, 11:58
- Mixed domains, fleet, 07:47